| EASY-TO-USE E-SCOPE© WORK PROCESS METHODOLOGY |
 |
A little of the old-fashioned way of valuing a case or dispute like meeting with colleagues, brainstorming the facts, and determining what the opposition might be thinking is always a good idea. E-Scope© lets you build on that common sense. It makes our staff and resources yours by providing an easy-to-use process for tying together documents, facts, and unique circumstances of your case to economic loss or valuation estimates:
| E |
Efficient consultation is held around your schedule with Dr. Penbera. A timely follow-up call is made by a Certified Legal Assistant who is trained in obtaining necessary information under the precepts of the National Forensics Center. We can also assist in document production, mobile notary, accounting, investigative, technical, teleconferencing, and other services. |
| S |
The Scope of the work is defined with certain work products in mind to keep your client’s costs to a minimum while maximizing quality. |
| C |
Computer -assisted data displays, tables, and charts are developed and supported by the latest software and reference sources. |
| O |
Opinions are offered in a confidential and truly collaborative exchange. We keep you continually apprised of findings. We rely on the principles of sound and published research, and evaluate carefully the potential for errors or contrary viewpoints. |
| P |
Presentation materials and reports are provided as requested. These materials can range from a simple opinion letter, studies, a completed narrative report, to graphics or exhibits |
| E |
Expert deposition and trial testimony, when requested. Dr. Penbera’s testimony has been accepted in local, state, national, and international jurisdictions. |
We strive for high quality Economic Loss and Valuation Estimates and Opinions. "High Quality" is defined as opinions that are understandable to the lay person, compelling with respect to assisting the judicial process in reaching a fair determination, and instructive as to the arguments and conclusions of opposing experts.
|
